Marcelo Rios vs Stefan Koubek Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L W L
Form
L W L W W W L L L LH2H: Rios 1 - 0 Koubek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rios winning 2 and Koubek winning 0. The last match between Rios and Koubek was at the Internationaler Raiffeisen Grand Prix - St. Polten, 17-05-1999, Quarterfinals, Clay with Marcelo Rios getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | 1 |
| Stefan Koubek | 0 |
Internationaler Raiffeisen Grand Prix - St. Polten(17-05-1999)
6
4
6
0
| Rios | Stats | Koubek |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 24 | Highest Rank | 35 |
| 49 | Age | 48 |
| L | Plays | L |
| 19 | Titles | 5 |
| 68% (388-184) | Career Total W/L | 51% (387-374) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $517,905 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marcelo Rios Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 5-7 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Mario Ancic
Player
Marcelo Rios
35%
(
8 of
23)
1st Serve %
52%
(
16 of
31)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
36
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R4 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Stefan Koubek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuriy Schukin
Player
Stefan Koubek
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
42%
(
29 of
69)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greg Jones
Player
Stefan Koubek
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-0 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Stefan Koubek
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Koubek
Player
Attila Balazs
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Stefan Koubek
Player
Christopher Kas
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Koubek
Player
Ante Pavic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Thomas Schoorel
Player
Stefan Koubek
54%
(
57 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
14
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
33 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Koubek
Player
Giovanni Lapentti
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Stefan Koubek
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (388/184) | Win/Loss | 51% (387/374) |
| 64% (921/520) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (953/960) |
| 54% (7530/6294) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (9161/9156) |
| 67% (138/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (128/120) |
| 70% (177/75) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (158/145) |
| 66% (67/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (91/89) |
| 50% (6/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (10/20) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 719 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 588 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 373.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 496.15 |
| 52% (16/31) | 1st Serve % | 59% (8808/14925) |
| 56% (9/16) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5953/8790) |
| 27% (4/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3132/6105) |
| 0% (0/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (562/1376) |
| 22% (5/23) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5751/14824) |
| 66% (51/26) | Slam W/L | 50% (45/45) |
| 69% (105/48) | Masters W/L | 42% (39/53) |
| 76% (16/5) | Cups W/L | 51% (20/19) |
| 67% (205/100) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (176/173) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 78% (7/2) | Challenger W/L | 56% (107/84) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (311/459) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (336/652) |
| 70% (71/102) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (47/103) |
| 61% (125/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (144/271) |
| 59% (90/153) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (131/242) |
| 90% (368/331) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (386/300) |
| 9% (368/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (386/85) |
| 28% (203/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (373/83) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
